Commons:Administrators' noticeboard

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:AN

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN|thread=|reason=}} ~~~~ is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Remove categories from user page

Luca Love Photo's user page seems to have a few categories that don't seem like they should be there? Don't know what the guidelines are for this

Like: Nature photography, Flower Photography, Butterflies, Macro photography, Landscapes Abandonee (talk) 08:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done I removed the categories. GPSLeo (talk) 08:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove CSS overrides from MediaWiki:Gadget-uploadWizardMobile.css

Hello, I would like to ask an interface admin to please remove the CSS overrides that make UW more responsive in MediaWiki:Gadget-uploadWizardMobile.css. Most of the things there have been implemented in UploadWizard, sometimes with some minor changes, but overall these overrides are no longer needed, and actually might cause bugs and malfunctions. Can someone please remove them? Thanks in advance! Sannita (WMF) (talk) 13:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sannita (WMF): Would you mind clarifying what you want? Do you want the gadget uploadWizardMobile removed from MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition? Alternatively, do you want something else, like MediaWiki:Gadget-uploadWizardMobile.css blanked, deleted, or edited? If that is the case you can specify the changes you would like to have done at MediaWiki talk:Gadget-uploadWizardMobile.css via {{Edit request}}, although if you mention what you want done here I'll see it. By the way, does this mean that phab:T261589 has been assigned to someone? —RP88 (talk) 05:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RP88 Actually, we don't know and I would defer this decision to you. Whichever is less taxing and easier for you to do.
As per phab:T261589, it was not assigned, but we're about to close it anyway, because the work was done through phab:T355248. Sannita (WMF) (talk) 12:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RP88 If I understand correctly, there is now fix for upload wizard so the local gadget can be removed from the MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition and MediaWiki:Gadget-uploadWizardMobile, MediaWiki:Gadget-uploadWizardMobile.css can be deleted. (note i was the proposer for the gadget at 2021) --Zache (talk) 13:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've removed uploadWizardMobile from MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition and then deleted the now unused css file. —RP88 (talk) 16:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

redlinked categories

User:Hornstrandir1 has mass-created red linked categories that are irrelevant and not needed. Do admins have a tool for mass-reversal? Schwede66 23:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66 They should have it as it is built into their tools. I will also add that this user has a history of doing this from looking at their discussion board. Perhaps a block will be warranted here (again). Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 23:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Schwede66 23:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Schwede66: I am myself unsure of massrollback/reversal tool. At the least I can't find it anywhere on my admin kit. ─ Aafī (talk) 03:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aafi I may have a script for you that may work. Give me a few minutes to go through my toolkit please. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 03:44, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Aafi Here are a couple that may work; though they may need to be customized:
  • Nuke - Only admin group can see and use this tool
Read through these and see if they help:
If twinkle works on here you may also have this option:
Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 03:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mass-deleting pages & mass-reversing/reverting are two different things. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 04:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AafiOnMobile@Aafi I believe all three can be used for deleting. Outside of that I only have other scripts to nominate. I can’t even warn users on here unless I do it manually. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 04:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I actually don't understand why my categories should all be deleted. Lots of them have beend linked to wikidata. Which ones do you think to be wrong ones?12:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Hornstrandir1 (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What are red-linked categories?12:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC) Hornstrandir1 (talk) 12:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hornstrandir1 Red linked means they are not created yet as they do not meet the criteria to have them created. Thanks, and be well! - PDLTalk to me!Please don't eat da 🐑! 21:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the information.Hornstrandir1 (talk) 15:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rev del request

Please revision delete GRP edits on Category:Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia. TIA, --SHB2000 (talk) 23:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by AntiCompositeNumber The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems only the edit summaries have been revdelled (not the edits). --SHB2000 (talk) 10:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But why should this addition be hidden? --A.Savin 10:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It was added by a WMF-banned user, and it's custom on most wikis to revision delete their edits. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO: Block, revert & ignore is enough, see also en:WP:DENY. --A.Savin 11:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, because they will go on a revert spree once the protection is over. Revdelling is also part of the "deny recognition" process. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree with this, what's the point keeping inflammatory comments on edit summaries. This does not give attention IMO. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - uselesscontributions} 16:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No point. I didn't suggest keeping inflammatory comments. --A.Savin 16:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for deleting them. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wasting resources

Can someone look into, delete the uploads of and potential even block the user User:Jarrod stanley ? This user has been uploading multi gigabyte, 7 hour videos of blackness and noise. This is extremely wasteful and behavior like this risks that uploads of this size are going to be restricted for most Commons users. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 20:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheDJ: Please post this on COM:ANU instead. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jarrod stanley‎. Yann (talk) 12:35, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fake descriptions

User:VPosypai contributed a number of artworks. User claimed that artworks are their own and are traditional drawings on paper, but those definitely are digital works, for example: File:Miran Marussig by VPosypai.jpg. Looks like those could be just modified real photos, and there is no indication that VPosypai is the owner of original photos. Siradan (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Siradan: You must inform users when you report them on a board. Yann (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know. I already informed VPosypai about this topic right after report. Siradan (talk) 12:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert edit

I wanted to revert spam edits in File:Nipple piercing ring.jpg, but it doesn't allow me since i don't have permission to review images, and therefore to add FlickreviewR template back. Can someone revert it. --Smooth O (talk) 12:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 12:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for documents in Brahmi script wherever available.

Nagiri/Devanagiri script is much younger than Brahmi script. I would appreciate it if you could publish the older manuscripts if available in Bhramhi script as original. I am sure any manuscript before 700 AD must be available in older script. Thanks Pisapatis (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pisapatis: Hi,
You are on the wrong board, as this would be much better suited on COM:VP. But do you have any idea where these manuscripts would be available? Yann (talk) 19:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion request

Hello, these files are completely in violation of copyright and have been downloaded from various sites without copyright permission: [1]

Grateful Pereoptic (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]